Although court review through both ALCs and NAECs has led EPBs to become more sensitive to legal issues and to follow the letter of the law more closely when enforcing environmental regulations, it failed to correct the displaced goals of EPB enforcement of the pollution levy system: instead of emphasizing pollution reduction, EPBs continue to focus on collecting levies to generate revenues by using court assistance. Moreover, court review has done little to reduce EPBs' arbitrary exercise of their own discretion in setting amounts of and collecting levies and fines.Mr. Ren explicitly addressed ALCs and NAECs together in the aadministrative adjudication workaquot; section.26Ad 3.3. ... 262 This section mostly focuses on the role of court officials and judges at a county court; however, given the court system, judges at ... The practice of qingshi has raised an important concern regarding the principle of afinality of judgments by two trialsaquot; of the Chinese adjudication system.
|Title||:||Enforcing Environmental Regulations in Hubei Province, China: Agencies, Courts, Citizens|
|Publisher||:||ProQuest - 2008|