Anthropology has long had a vexed relationship with literature, and nowhere has this been more acutely felt than in France, where most ethnographers, upon returning from the field, write not one book, but two: a scientific monograph and a literary account. In Far Afieldabrought to English-language readers here for the first timeaVincent Debaene puzzles out this phenomenon, tracing the contours of anthropology and literatureas mutual fascination and the ground upon which they meet in the works of thinkers from Marcel Mauss and Georges Bataille to Claude LAcvi-Strauss and Roland Barthes. The relationship between anthropology and literature in France is one of careful curiosity. Literary writers are wary about anthropologistsa scientific austerity but intrigued by the objects they collect and the issues they raise, while anthropologists claim to be scientists but at the same time are deeply concerned with writing and representational practices. Debaene elucidates the richness that this curiosity fosters and the diverse range of writings it has produced, from Proustian memoirs to proto-surrealist diaries. In the end he offers a fascinating intellectual history, one that is itself located precisely where science and literature meet.The project was not only (in a top-down, paternalist approach) to amake museums available to the people, a but also to effect a ... 72 On page 7 of the same issue were listed the statutes of the future APAM, signed by Rivet, RiviAure, Leiris, andanbsp;...
|Publisher||:||University of Chicago Press - 2014-04-04|