The development of fair, objective, a manageable offender classification systems (CS) has been a significant concern of correctional admin. for some time. Building a facility expansion programs are critically affected by classification decisions, as is resource allocation for programming. Parity issues a the possibility of litigation are major concerns. This report presents a critical review of issues relevant to the evaluation of correctional CS. Topics covered: standards for conducting classification evaluations; impact evaluation a validation goals; evaluation questions, designs, a method; a sampling a data collection techniques. Examples used reflect actual evaluations of CS a should be helpful in clarifying areas of concern. Illustrations.There may be a question you cannot answer exactly. For example ... They will help you to understand the questions and answer them correcdy. If you have a ... l\1\t\(. 0 0 0 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 oO 10 20 30 40 50 0 60 0 70 0 80 0 9Al 10 8 OOO 9* 10 20 30 m 4 0 50 60 70 8Al 90 ... A person who is not of Spanish/Hispanic origin should answer this question by filling the No (not Spanish/Hispanic) circle. Note thatanbsp;...
|Title||:||Handbook for Evaluating Objective Prison Classification Systems|
|Publisher||:||DIANE Publishing - 2008-04|