As a possible indicator of test score manipulations, comparisons are made between state test score trends and NAEP trends in reading and mathematics in grades 4 and 8. Due to technical limitations in comparing simple changes in proficiency rates, a scale-invariant framework based on P-P plots is used to estimate state-NAEP score trend discrepancy effect sizes. These effect sizes show that state trends were significantly larger than NAEP trends from 2003-05, 2005-07, and 2003-07.He alleges that committee members aquot;regularly smuggle out secret TAKS information to share in the home districts.aquot; Another ... In 2005, no sixth grade student in the school passed the math subtest of the Ohio Achievement Test. One year later ... Winifred Shima, a teacher from the Parma district, used a copy of the test to create a study guide for students that included 45 of the 46 actual test questions.
|Title||:||Relationship Between Test Security Policies and Test Score Manipulations|
|Author||:||Bradley Adam Thiessen|
|Publisher||:||ProQuest - 2008|