This dissertation provides a critical analysis of critiques of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 published in peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles between 2002 and 2007. Particularly, the work analyzes how authors of these critiques participate in the cultural logics promoted in the law: closing the achievement gap through accountability, standards, and high-stakes testing.This led me to search the Arizona State University and the University of Pennsylvania Libraries Catalogue to find out if the journal and ... I also conducted manual searches given that some important journals (e.g. Harvard Educational Review), although readily available in ... First, I identified all academic books written about NCLB, education/school reform, accountability in education, standards-basedanbsp;...
|Title||:||Systemic Anomies - Discursive Panaceas: A Critical Analysis of Selected Scholarly Critiques of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001|
|Author||:||Cristian R. Aquino-Sterling|
|Publisher||:||ProQuest - 2009|