This case is an essential reference for any author or publisher who is considering the publicati0n of an unauthorized book that complements or comments upon copyrighted material by another author. In this case, J. K. Rowling and Warner Brothers prevailed against RDR Books, which had published an unauthorized qcompanion guideq that relied very heavily on qfictional factsq created by J. K. Rowling in the Harry Potter series.B. RDR Booksa#39; Acquisition and Marketing of the Lexicon Roger Rapoport is the president of Defendant RDR Books. ... Prior to August 2007, Vander Ark had developed and circulated the opinion that publishing aany book that is a guide to [ theanbsp;...
|Title||:||Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. & J. K. Rowling V. Rdr Books and 10 Does|
|Author||:||District Court S Us District Court Sdny|
|Publisher||:||Nimble Books LLC - 2010-08|